when they fuck us

i was gonna write a different post, one about Elliot Rodger and what he exposed about men. but i feel that first i need to get another one out of the way. one about piv, and why it’s rape. this is a post i have been wanting to write for a while, but always postpone it, but then i get involved in yet another frustrationg discussion about piv with a self-proclaimed feminist who doesn’t get it or i read a post about piv by another femininst who gets it a bit more, but still not really… both of these things happened in the past several weeks, then Rodger killed a bunch of people because he didn’t get any “consensual piv” from the women he wanted to get “it” from and so here i am, finally writing that post.

ok so here we go. piv/intercourse/fucking is rape. i am not the first woman to write this (fcm’s intercourse series, witchwind’s piv-post), but i feel that this cannot be repeated often enough, because women have such a hard time getting this.

when they fuck us, they rape us. fucking us is about raping us. fucking is the same as rape,  not because it is intercourse that is forced on us, i.e. not the forcing of fucking is what makes fucking rape, but the fucking itself is the rape.

fucking is rape not because of the way it is done to us (violently, against our will) but because of what it does to us. when they fuck us, they use us as masturbation device and sperm bucket. they even call us that: cum bucket. when they fuck us, they use us, to stimulate the penis mechanically by rubbing it between the muscle tissue that is our vagina until they ejaculate, placing their sperm inside our reproductive organs. which, unless we take measures to avoid it, will very often lead to pregnancy. the vast majority of times when men stick their penisses into our reproductive organs in order to stimulate their penisses with the help of the insides of our bodies, thats not what they -or we – want to happen. pregnancy. however, since it feels so good for men to stimulate their penisses by rubbing them against our internal organs, they do not care about this. and neither are we allowed to care about this or think about this. not enough to result in men not being able to stick their dicks into our abdomens, anyway.

to repeat: when men fuck us they instrumentalize our internal muscle tissues in order to maturbate themselves to ejaculation. not in order to truly interact with us (they could do that another way), not to bring us to orgasm (they could do that another way), not to make us feel good and loved (they could do that another way), nor, most of the time, because we want to become pregnant.

there are two reasons why men fuck us:

  1. it makes them feel a perverse kind of pleasure, one that derives from being sexually stimulated and breaking a taboo at the same time. The taboo is crossing physical boundaries and utilizing someone else’s body for your own means, that is, not respecting the right to life of another living being.
  2. they want to use our reproductive organs/capacities directly, without having to go through us, in other words, impregnate us against our wills, in other words, clone their genetic material (and they only really care about their y-chro) through us.

in both cases they objectify us, which is dehumanizing. when you dehumanize someone, you kill a part of them. you kill some of the connections that hold this person together. by using someone as if they were not alive and whole, you make them less alive and whole. when men fuck us, they turn us from whole to hole, they make us into a thing, they kill us. is it any wonder so many women out there are walking around shell-shocked, out of their own bodies, self-objectifyingly turning themselves into walking fuck dolls? thats what men do to us when they fuck us and that is why they fuck us. They want us absent from our own bodies, so that they can use our bodies without having to deal with us.

naturally, men don’t want us to notice. which is why we can never frame simple fucking itself as rape. noooo, rape is this thing where a stranger jumps a woman and against her screaming and struggling, biting and scratching, violently sticks his dick into her internal organs and violently and forcibly uses her internal muscle tissue to stimulate himself to orgasm. that’s rape, or so men want us to believe. this is why if there is any talk about rape at all, it is always about the way that he fucked her. with how much force?

or if she wanted it. because we all know violence is not really violence when it is done to women because women like being treated violently and if someone likes it when you violate them you didn’t really violate them. or so the logic goes. so if we can get her to consent its not rape either. very clever. the language of consent is actually patriarchy’s reaction to women’s awakening consciousness to themselves as human beings, who should not be used by men to stimulate their penisses until they spit out sperm.

so in order to derail from the act of fucking, lest women notice that the act itself is dehumanizing, they invent the concept of consent, so that again violence can be made invisible, and so they can go on fucking us. the language of consent implies that someone else (the man) makes a suggestion (he wants to fuck, he is the agent) and that she then agrees. the consenting party is by definition not the one who came up with the idea in the frst place. also, the language of consent implies that women’s bodies are some kind of land, or territory, which the man wants to enter and thus needs the woman’s consent to enter her. what are we, landladies of our own internal organs? and rape is like, what, trespassing? stealing?

can you not see, sisters, that this whole concept implies that we are not whole human beings? or that our bodies are somehow separate from us, which is why we can consent to someone else using our bodies as if that didn’t mean that they were using us? our bodies are us, we are our bodies!

even when women realize that the concept of consent is flawed because women are brainwashed and groomed to consent, and therefore consent is meaningless,  it still works as a derail, because then often some women will argue until they’re blue in the face that there might be a woman liberated enough somewhere (!!) to freely consent to fucking and that then fucking might not be rape.

see what they are doing there? by making the conversation about whether or not consent can be meaningful, men derail it in case women get too close to realizing what is really wrong with fucking, when the point is this: fucking is whats wrong with fucking. the act itself, the usage of another’s living body (a woman’s vagina, a woman’s anus, a woman’s mouth, a child’s vagina, anus or mouth, the mouth of a fish, the anus of a dog etc. etc.) to stimulate the penis until it ejaculates, in other words, fucking, is an act by which men make a living being into a dead thing.

now, if you’ve ever been in a discussion about fucking with men or brainwashed women you will know that no discussion about fucking is complete without someone hashing out the old “but what about procreation of the species” line.

(disclaimer: to my radfem sisters, i am not advocating sex with men or reproducing with men here. all i want to do is show how even if we wanted to reproduce with them, penetration would still be the wrong way to do it.)

imagine if you will a world without patriarchy. one in which women have full control over our own bodies. now, firstly, we all know that sperm can travel inside the vagina, because it lives for several hours/days. We all have been warned that sperm, if deposited close to the vaginal opening, can still result in pregnancy and therefore penisses should always be wrapped in plastic when at all in the vicinity of our vaginal opening. therefore, the penis does not need to be inserted into our internal organs at all in order to conceive. it would be perfectly sufficient if men just deposited their sperm on our front steps, so to speak, and left us alone do proceed with it as we damn well please!

secondly, considering that the clit is the only human organ with the sole purpose of causing pleasure, but cannot be directly stimulated via intercourse; however, given the shape and size of the average penis, stimulation of the clit can very easily achieved by rubbing the penis between the labia and over the clit, wouldn’t it make more sense if this was how we did “sex” (for purposes of pregnancy?). if women were free and had a strong sense of physical integrity, wouldn’t it make sense for us to never ever insert men at all?

i saw a “documentary” about “sex” a few years ago and one bit of information stuck to the back of my mind: when a woman orgasms, the muscle contractions of the vaginal muscles make her cervix “dip” down towards the vaginal opening, sucking anything in the vagina upwards. so if we wanted to have sex with men (for purposes of pregnancy) at all in a world in which we are free, we could just have the d00d deposit the genetic material we need at a place from which we can haul it in ourselves, so to speak, which is at the vaginal opening (between the labia) for which no penetration is needed at all, and which can be completely pleasurable for the woman. but of course d00ds can never just be useful without being overly demanding in return. they don’t want to accept that they are mere carriers of genetic material for us, that we are the creatrixes and they are (supposed to be) the helpers. nooooooo. men have to be the center of everything and control everything, otherwise their fragile egos shatter.

they don’t want to leave the package by the front door, no, they want to come in, vandalize the space and throw their shit around without any regard for the fact that they are in our sanctuary! rapist assholes. they want to use our sanctuary without respecting the natural authority of the place, they envy its power (its their “holy grail”/white whale, the fountain/source of life itself), they want to own it and instrumentalize it for their own necrophiliac purposes.

and this is how intercourse is men’s reproductive strategy at our cost. intercourse allows men to make use of our reproductive powers. they are not supposed to have control over reproduction, otherwise they would be the reproducing sex and not just the carriers of  dna. they are supposed to assist. notice also how in this scenario woman’s clit actually has a reproductive function: woman rubs clit aganst penis, penis ejaculates and deposits sperm close to vaginal opening, woman orgasms sucking in sperm into vagina. this way, woman’s orgasm is an evolutionary advantage, because it increases the chances of conception. note how in this scenario woman’s physical integrity is not destroyed. and now visualize fucking. can you see how here woman’s orgasm/pleasure/Presence is entirely redundant? by inserting their penisses into us men circumvent having to truly connect with the woman they are being “intimate” with. engaging her soul is not necessary for conception at all if you just push the penis inside and deposit the sperm directly onto the cervix.

and this is basically what men don’t want us to know: men have invented fucking to make use of the goddess’s creative powers, to steal our powers from us. by fucking us, men artificially inflate their power. fucking us is the fundament on which their supremacy rests. fucking is their way to protest against evolution, trying to control natural (woman directed) selection by making sure their y-chromo gets replicated. and look where this strategy has led. the most violent men have spread their y-chromos all over the world! this is what Bryan Sykes, geneticist, has to say about this (source):

“However, if you trace the Y chromosome’s fingerprints back through human history, you see that it reports some very unpleasant behavior. Take Genghis Khan’s Y chromosome, which is now found in 16 million men in Central Asia. It started as a single copy from the man himself in the 12th century. What drove this? Well, when he conquered a territory, he killed the men and systematically inseminated the most attractive women. A thousand years later, his Y chromosome has survived and proliferated, which is sexual selection on a very grand scale.”

(note that he says “sexual selection” but of course he means artificial selection, aka rape, aka fucking.)

you really think men’s increasing sociopathy and overall violence has nothing to do with this??

if you still do not believe, sister, that fucking is war, that the point of fucking is to control evolution, consider this image which has been circulated among Israelis since the start of Israel’s latest attempt to annihiliate Palestinians and “ethnically cleanse” “their” land from what they consider inferior y-chroms:

Darling, come inside this time.  Civilians for invasion.
(caption: darling, come inside this time.
civilians for invasion.)

ask yourself, would anyone understand the message of this image if they didn’t subliminally know that fucking = war?

when men fuck us, they damage us, they destroy our wholeness/integrity: physically, psychologically, spiritually. fucking = war. yes, all fucking. that’s the whole point!

this, sisters, is the root of patriarchy. let’s rip it out. #stopfucking!

 

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

19 Responses to when they fuck us

  1. also “i like it” is not analysis. i didn’t cover this in the post because to me it’s such a no brainer. but many women (feminists, even) seem to think that when they derive pleasure from fucking, this means it can’t be rape. lots of things feel good but are bad for you, heroin, for example. this is not a valid criterion to assess whether or not fucking is harmful!! we are groomed into eroticizing fucking from a very early age and by all kinds of media. this means that our brains are trained to emit pleasure hormones, it’s really the same mechanism as with any OTHER addiction.
    also, often fucking feels like the only time when the nigel seems really interested in us at all, which is why many women actively seek intercourse with their captors. however, this does not make fucking harmless. as i have laid out in my post, it is the act itself which rapes our humanity, so whether you liked it, had an orgasm, initiated it etc is absolutely beside the point.
    the fact that many women actively seek out intercourse with men is explicable in the context of patriarchy (which i don’t want to get into here): it’s an addiction. it’s a symptom of MAD: male-approval deficiency, with which men try to infect us basically from birth. why? because men need access to our bodies and our energy in order to thrive. not only to thrive, in order to survive. you wanna smash patriarchy? get rid of any men in your lives and most importantly: try not to let them fuck you. ever.

  2. skulldrix says:

    I hate dudes. They are so unattractive. Lesbianism is the greater alternative. This is a great post, it’s been covered in depth a lot, but we definitely can always use more in input. Your analysis of clitoral orgasms is pretty original.

    And really, all we can conclude from men’s obsessed with intercourse as sex is that they are naturally sadists and love to torture. They know that there are other ways to achieve orgasm, and they know that fucking doesn’t give them to women. They just love to torture, truthfully. They are masters of freaking torture.

    I don’t think we women need sex to reproduce. Intercourse has turned sexual reproduction into destruction. Females across the mammal world are aware of men’s inherent evil also, they just don’t have entire cultures built around it.

    The question is what the hell are we going to do ?

  3. EllieG says:

    Great post and analysis. PIV is just another patriarchal ritual of female subordination.
    Also in terms of philosopher Mary Daly’s theory, it is as you point out, another form of men parasiting on female energy.
    Also agree with your point that PIV destroys and fragments female bodily and psychological integrity !

  4. Hey Ellie,
    thanks for you comment! i don’t know if you’ve read the blog post by wwomenwwarriors on piv and effects on the first two chakras. if not, i highly recommend. men really “plug in” to us when they fuck us and i am convinced that they suck our life force by doing so. they can’t access Source directly so they have to do so by sticking their dicks into us, they dicks being their receptacles. they really are parasites. i don’t think men could survive without piv, at least not in their current state. it’s very creepy.

  5. Excellent post. But we do not have to have sex with men to perpetuate the species. (I plan on writing about this soon).

    When we look at the other animals, we can see the biological arrangements they’ve developed come not just from environmental conditions, but from actual political agreements. (The female mantis eating the male, for example, shows how political and biological arrangement coalesce). Meaning we human females — The Makers and Admins of the Species — currently have this shitty arrangement with human males because unfortunately, most females have accepted it — both politically and biologically.

    Acceptance goes down to the biological level. For example, genetic imprinting by men blocks our ability to do parthenogenesis (males shut down and “replace” about 2 of our genes — a LOT of conflict between males and females takes place genetically and chemically under out skin! — it’s astonishing!) — but our bodies have not yet figured out how to counter this block. Yet we women have the potential to make the species entirely female. And we carry that potential with us everywhere.

    Men of course keep most women in a state of non-consciousness, largely by what you describe so clearly and devastatingly here, RK– and it is that non-consciousness that has to change before we can move into new biological arrangements. Consciousness feeds the political agreements which feed the biological arrangements, which reflect the consciousness and political agreements. They feed each other. The ability to transform — This is what being alive means. Life is transformation over time. Men want us to think life is static, set, fixed — that the entire biological arrangement currently accepted by women is static set fixed — — — but nothing could be further from the truth.

  6. thanks for you comment trust!
    please do write that post about parthenogenesis and genetic imprinting soon! i can’t wait to read it!! did you see i linked to your blog in my latest post (how blatant does it have to be?), because i think one of the reasons men want to fuck us, NEED to fuck us, is in order to NOT feel their own degeneracy. your concept of grim-levelling aptly describes the process. they feel so humiliated when they compare themselves to us and also because they need us in order to access Life Force, that they -as you say – want to level the playing field by shitting on us. i think thats behind all their necrophiliac endeavours, like fracking etc etc. they cannot leave anything alone that is better than they are. how to wake up more women? i fear that men will really openly declare war on us soon, as Andrea Dworkin was fearing that they are preparing the next holocaust against us. will women wake up then? will it be too late? my impression is that female energy is so shattered right now, there is hardly any conscious work by a large group of women AS WOMEN to establish a female force field. and so we are all alone, in exile, barely hanging on, surviving from day to day but thriving? not really. i need an infusion of hope, i need to be around women. i so wish i could have gone to Michfest. i need to believe that women can love other women and stand by each other consciously AGAINST MEN. or have they managed to fuck us to death already?

  7. Yes, the consciousness is not there. And that’s the heartache one lives with seeing through radfem eyes. But we have to also see that life on Earth takes place over vast amounts of time, that female animals can evolve different strategies for making life, and that males are set to expire. Male scientists are holding conferences on creating artificial chromosomes, it’s true (the discussion started in 1996 at the National Research Council in Milan, and Italian scientists even put together a book — “Mammilaian Artificial Chromosomes” in 2004). But I don’t think they will able to beat this decaying y chromosome thing, or sperm decay. The biological decay of men will incite biological and political and consciousness changes. It’s just a matter of time. (Can you see, even in the dudes you have to deal with that the younger generation of males has slipped some, that there is something even less right about them? Even the old dudes talk about this, and actually attribute it to (LOL) feminism).

    I really like what you say about getting pleasure from the rape encounter does not mean it isn’t rape. I wish you could expand on that, write a piece just on that, because it is such an obstacle for women. Like WW said, men making S/M porn will have a woman being tortured rub her clitoris, so she associates pleasure with shame, pain and degradation. They have been testing this training thing since Pavlov and BF Skinner. As Skulldrix says here: “And really, all we can conclude from men’s obsessesed with intercourse as sex is that they are naturally sadists and love to torture.”

    Radical Kitten, your analysis of “consent” is startlingly insightful, and I’m going to quote it here, because it really needs to be ABSORBED:

    “so in order to derail from the act of fucking, lest women notice that the act itself is dehumanizing, they invent the concept of consent, so that again violence can be made invisible, and so they can go on fucking us. the language of consent implies that someone else (the man) makes a suggestion (he wants to fuck, he is the agent) and that she then agrees. the consenting party is by definition not the one who came up with the idea in the frst place. also, the language of consent implies that women’s bodies are some kind of land, or territory, which the man wants to enter and thus needs the woman’s consent to enter her. what are we, landladies of our own internal organs? and rape is like, what, trespassing? stealing?

    “can you not see, sisters, that this whole concept implies that we are not whole human beings? or that our bodies are somehow separate from us, which is why we can consent to someone else using our bodies as if that didn’t mean that they were using us? our bodies are us, we are our bodies!

    “even when women realize that the concept of consent is flawed because women are brainwashed and groomed to consent, and therefore consent is meaningless, it still works as a derail, because then often some women will argue until they’re blue in the face that there might be a woman liberated enough somewhere (!!) to freely consent to fucking and that then fucking might not be rape.

    “see what they are doing there? by making the conversation about whether or not consent can be meaningful, men derail it in case women get too close to realizing what is really wrong with fucking, when the point is this: fucking is whats wrong with fucking.”

    No one knows more that PIV is on the spectrum of rape, and that rape is how men and women ultimately interact — no one knows this more viscerally — than a woman who once had a pocket vagina. I hear you.We should all hear you. Thank you, RK.

  8. witchwind says:

    Hi Alexis, well thanks for repeating it! And it definitely wasn’t repetitive, but continues to shed new light on all the different aspects of intercourse as rape. I personally find it very difficult to synthesize everything around intercourse/rape since it’s the total, essential act of patriarchal annihilation and contains everything about patriarchy: there’s the societal/social aspects (how it’s enforced and an integral part of men’s social and political structure), the biological / reproductive aspects, the violence/war aspects (it is both means and end of subordinating women), the symbolic / mythological aspects (reversals, men wanting to take women’s central place in the creation, etc)… Intercourse is the quintessential act of patriarchy, on which male supremacy is founded, its core mechanism.

    It’s also really important to stress and recall that the dehumanisation and inherent violence from rape/PIV comes from the fact that it’s the using of our selves as receptacles, objects: we cease to be interacted with as whole human beings, our lives and integrity are denied when we are used as a thing to ejaculate into. This is why it’s violent.

    This is the sentence that stayed with me most: <em<"They want us absent from our own bodies, so that they can use our bodies without having to deal with us."

    This is so well said. They want us as receptacles and incubators because they can’t reproduce themselves and survive without us, so they need to keep us barely alive enough so we can continue to perform this function – but never reach the point where we could rebel, escape and put an end to their destructive craze. They need to keep us functioning physically but absent psychically – basically, keep us as zombies, shells. Rape is the violence that causes the worst forms of dissociation and trauma – it is both the means (causes us to be absent from our bodies) and the ends (control over reproduction, control over females as a whole).

    You rounded it really well.

    Something I’d add and that I’ve planned to write about (the number of posts i want to write is forever growing, i don’t have the time to keep up with my thoughts) is that regular PIV is also a way to ensure a higher rate of birth of boys, to prevent the natural higher elimination rate of male fetuses (mostly caused by some early form of pre-eclampsia).

  9. sellmaeth says:

    Sorry, I’m late to the debate. Hope some of you do still look at this post.

    Anyway, skulldrix: “The question is what the hell are we going to do ?”

    This is the question, isn’t it? That has always been my problem with radical feminism. Liberal feminism has clear goals (reproductive rights, etc) that can be achieved. But “smash the patriarchy” is a bit nebulous.

    Witchwind, you mention that PIV ensures a higher rate of birth of boys. I think that is a very interesting point. I checked some sex ratio statistics in the past few days, and noticed that Iceland has a sex ratio of exactly 1, meaning one man per woman, and the birth rate is 1.04 boys per girl. (Worldwide, it is 1.01 men per woman, and a birth ratio of 1.07). Unlike other countries, where there is a seemingly even ratio because women live longer than men, in Iceland, men outnumber women at 1.02 to 1.03 until age 64, when their number drops, as could have been expected.
    In many other countries, women outnumber men, but that’s elderly women, who may not be on the streets to keep an eye on things.
    So, could that be significant? Are there more women of all ages in Iceland because it is a civilised country with a low crime rate, or is it such a nice country to live in exactly because there are many women?

  10. Dana says:

    I just thought of something while reading this. Y sperm are weaker than X sperm, more vulnerable to acids and other environmental influences. The vagina is an acidic environment, and the longer Y sperm hang out in that environment, the more of them die.

    So making them travel farther to the cervix would have the interesting effect of decreasing the chances of a resulting baby being a boy.

    It makes me wonder if men don’t somehow understand this on some subconscious, instinctive level–because we didn’t always know about X and Y chromosomes, but guys have always wanted to penetrate.

    I still *like* penetration but, interestingly, a lot better after my own orgasm. Everything feels better then. It still goes back to how things go better if he sees me as a human being and makes my pleasure at least as important as his if not more so.

    This is all academic, of course, as I haven’t been “properly” (from a mainstream point of view) laid in 8 or 9 years now, give or take.

  11. Yes good point about men instinctively knowing that they have to get their spunk as deeply in as possible in order to ensure that their y-chromo gets replicated. Thanks for that insight!

  12. brackengold says:

    Thank you for providing me this lightbulb moment for this topic. I never grasped this idea before.

    I think I know why heterosexual women have a hard time understanding this: we’re carefully trained to have a definition of the activity “sex” as specifically involving a penis, and in particular, penis-in-something. There’s no pleasure like penis pleasure. No “real sex” without a male orgasm. If you don’t “go all the way” then you’re causing a man pain and frustration, interrupting a natural progression of some sort. Even male fantasy “lesbian sex” has to involve some kind of tool that looks like a penis for the fantasists to find it acceptable.

    It’s the basis for so, so many heterosexual women developing “sexual dysfunction” in their mid-life or thereabouts. You may feel like being physically intimate, but if you don’t want PIV then there’s something wrong with you. You’re discouraged from investigating any other kind of pleasure, discouraged from exploring to find out what you really like.

  13. exactly! and piv gets SO boring after you have done it for some years. so most women in their middle age figure this out eventualy, even if they might not consciously understand why they don’t want to do this shit anymore. And then of course men tell us that something is wrong with US. fuckers.

  14. Anonymous says:

    Just wanted to mention a genuine method for women to reduce their chances of having male babies, without resorting to abortion: go vegan or vegetarian.

    Check out this news report on a study that found women on a vegetarian diet had only 85 male babies to every 100 girls, versus the average of 106 males to 100 girls.
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/869696.stm

    I find it funny that a more compassionate diet results in the creation of people who are more likely to be compassionate.

  15. Actually, that might have to do with the fact that building a male baby is something the female body only risks if it gets enough nutrition since making baby boys puts so much more stress on the mother than making a female. But yeah, interesting. Also this further explains what that interest of men is behind wanting to make people eat so much meat: more y-chromo carriers! Ugh.

  16. Selena Sato says:

    Hi, how about oral sex? Explicitly, fellatio & cunnilingus. None of these activities seems to me to damage the integrity of the participants and both seem to be possible sources of pleasure. Is this the case, or am I overlooking some essential aspect here?

  17. Coatlicue says:

    The biased sex ratio at birth has nothing to do with where and how men ejaculate. Rather, it has all to do with the simple biological fact that male fetuses have a higher mortality rate, as do newborn baby boys. This, in turn, results from the higher testosterone levels that male fetuses require; and testosterone is a very harmful homrone in many ways. It is a powerful building agent, true, but is also, if not administered just right, an equally potentl destroyer. Nature’s way of solving this problem has been very simple and very typical of evolution: Rather than developing a new, improved male hormone, it simply skews the sex ratio at insemination in order to compensate for the expected higher mortality rate of male fetuses, babies and children. Thus, in natural conditions (NOT in our medicared society) the sex ratio will become practically even by the end of puberty, since more girls survive to that age than boys do, even though more boys are born.

  18. Anonymous says:

    Re: oral sex. Unfortunately, fellatio can be an extremely violent act if the male is able to get on top and control the action. It can result in serious injury or even death by suffocation.

    I can’t think of any objections to cunnlingus, except that many women tend to get bladder and vaginal infections, and mouth bacteria could potentially make this worse.

  19. some d00d sent me this genius comment:
    “As a male, I am entertained by the obvious bias generated by your sexual preference. One has to only look around us to understand that mating is our primary function.”

    YES D00D, fucking might well be MEN’S primary function. So? I’m talking about women here.

    “The issues of heterosexual sex are real,but they are still driven by the need to mate.”

    MEN’S need to “mate.”

    “As lesbians, a choice that is freely yours to make,there isn’t an end game. If everyone paired off with someone of their own gender,we would solve global warming very fast.”

    Global warming? Or Global overpopulation? In any case, EXACTLY!!!!!

    “The secret is to evolve! The prime urges and instincts need to balance out with our ability to care for each other. This requires education. The instincts that brought us this far no longer need to be so primitive. Man no longer needs to hunt for survival.”

    “Man” never needed to hunt for survival. Men have always been dependant on women for their survival. Always. On women’s genius and finding edibles and so on.

    “The time has come for a mutual understanding of the future and how we can all reach it together. Please,to critique man as a rapist is all to easy.”

    First of all, women’s future and men’s future are not the same. Men will soon disappear from the fac eof the earth. Women hopefully won’t. And damn straight critiquing men as rapists is easy because thats what they show us every day they are. Duh.

    “You lower the ability of every woman who disagrees with your ideas.”

    Huh!? I don’t get the sentence. Is he blaming me for disempowering women? How? By speaking the truth? Fuck off d00d with your gaslighting.

    “Enhance the power of your thoughts by being inclusive not exclusive.”

    AHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, fuck off asshole with your reversals. The power of my thoughts lies in being able to discriminate between reality and men’s pseudo-reality. Including men’s feelings in my analysis does not make it more powerful. But that’s not really what you want anyway, is it?

    Men: don’t comment here. This is female sovereign space.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s